Once upon a discussion with my libertarian now-ex-boyfriend, he told me that I shouldn't get so upset over "the little things," like "that's so lame" or the eleventy-millionth depiction of bisexual women as slutty, indecisive, or outright evil, because ... I don't know, I guess because sharia exists, or something. The Real Problems, as defined by a white, middle-class, straight, cis man, because bisexual women don't get to define our own problems, I guess.
sohotrightnow has this excellent post on why little things matter.
And as far as the casual throwing around of "lame" as a derogatory term, who does it hurt to make the effort not to use words others find offensive? Ask yourself, if someone said "that's so gay," would it piss you off? Would it add to the hundreds of papercuts of society-wide injustice perpetrated against the LGBT* community? If yes, then STOP USING LAME as a replacement for gay in that sense.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Do not ever forget that it started small, that the Holocaust was merely the logical conclusion of the gradual devaluing and dehumanizing of large swaths of people -- some people claim that focusing on microaggressions and trying to end them is reductio ad absurdum; I'd go in a different direction and call the Holocaust an increscio ad absurdum: a completely logical series of steps from one degree of devaluing and dehumanizing to the next, on up to the most horrifying and completely logical conclusion. But don't forget either that there were a lot of people, along the way, who did fight, who didn't simply accept the tiny little ways their society had told them, day in and day out, for their entire lives, that certain lives were worth less than others, that certain people were less human than others. Don't use the latter fact to write off the former, because if more people had spoken up from the beginning, if more people had examined their assumptions and their language and the casual everyday ways they devalued and dehumanized the undesirable, maybe the more dramatic actions of the Righteous wouldn't have been necessary. But don't let the former cause you to lose hope, to think that there is nothing you can possibly do in the face of widely-held, systemically-enforced, popularly-approved and -perpetuated injustice. And by God, don't let it be an excuse to do nothing, to ignore the microaggressions because there are "real" problems, "real" injustices: because -- I know I am saying this over and over again, but seriously -- if more people had stopped and examined the small injustices they were committing or simply ignoring from the beginning, there may not have been a need for a few people to give up their lives trying to stop huge injustices.
And as far as the casual throwing around of "lame" as a derogatory term, who does it hurt to make the effort not to use words others find offensive? Ask yourself, if someone said "that's so gay," would it piss you off? Would it add to the hundreds of papercuts of society-wide injustice perpetrated against the LGBT* community? If yes, then STOP USING LAME as a replacement for gay in that sense.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 05:20 pm (UTC)From:It was such a great post I think everyone should read and think about.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 05:28 pm (UTC)From:And, serendipitously, two more articles about the harm of language and the effects of institutionalized $ism crossed my RSS feed today.
http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2011/02/fox_news_worried_about_the_war.php
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2011/02/challenge.html (TW: transphobia)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 06:09 pm (UTC)From:And thanks for the links, I've bookmarked them.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 05:57 pm (UTC)From:Have you ever read about Raoul Wallenberg?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 06:08 pm (UTC)From:And affirmative action is unnecessary, the Civil Rights Act was unnecessary because the INVISIBLE HAND!!!!!, the ADA was unnecessary and had undesirable unforeseen consequences besides. So, clearly, working to correct the larger social problems is wrong, too. And let's not forget that social justice is just librul commie code for punishing the rich/white/men.
I hadn't, then I turned to the google. Interesting guy.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 06:29 pm (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 06:52 pm (UTC)From:It may be that anger serves to communicate a viewpoint or an idea to people who are less angry, who can then play the ambassador role. I hope that's true -- the things that make me so eye-twitchingly mad that I can't imagine being diplomatic about them, are themselves the things that actually matter in my view. I'd like to imagine that my more moderate friends take my perspective and convey it to others in conversations where I'm not present, or at least think about the ideas when they're at the polls. But I think it's more likely that instead they tune out my bile and look for a way to change the subject.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 07:04 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 07:08 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 07:08 pm (UTC)From:I think you're right that too much bile will make people tune out, but being too nice will also make people tune out because then you're not being interesting. You need a good mix of passion and reason to make an argument that people will listen to. It's the contrast that makes things interesting; if the argument is one-note in either key, then it gets boring.
It reminds me of a production of "Danton's Death" I saw a few years ago where EVERY! SCENE!! AND EVERY! ACTOR!!! WAS TURNED UP TO ELEVEN!1!!!! Despite all the intensity, it put me to sleep because it was relentless. Contrast is what our brains notice.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 07:11 pm (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 08:13 pm (UTC)From:I'm trying to figure out what alternate phrasings I could use that are non-offensive for those times when I want to say that something or someone is crazy or insane. I'll have to think more about it, but if you have any suggestions I'm interested.
Lame I use so rarely that I could probably find a way around it. It's used so seldom in my experience to apply to people with disabilities that I'd almost forgotten it could also have that meaning. At the ranch it's got a specific meaning with respect to horses, but I'd never apply that to people and it never dawned on me that the horses may get offended. I could imagine myself using it in the context of "My son's lame attempt at humor failed to cheer me up." I could probably just drop the word and the meaning of my thoughts would still be evident.
Personally, I'd add "fuck" to the list of offensive words. To me it connotes a violent act of sex, tantamount to rape, and I'd prefer people not to use it so regularly and casually.
--Beth
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 08:23 pm (UTC)From:Mostly, it's about getting past linguistic laziness. Sure, lame/retarded/crazy is easy to grab onto and use, but English is a really versatile language with a lot of words. We can take advantage of that. Down in the second link there are some synonyms offered.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 06:17 am (UTC)From:I do sometimes self-describe as "lame" since it is a part of my personal potpourri of issues, although it's more intermittent since my issues with walking are not within my legs but based on the systemic issues. Although if I exert myself then I will appear lame if I then try to walk. Mainly I use it so I can point out that being disabled is so lame[1].
[1] Which I'm allowed to do because I'm legally blind. When you go blind it turns out that one of your other senses magically improves[2]. Usually it is your sense of humor.
[2] Not guaranteed to happen in all cases. The author takes no responsibility for people who blind themselves and gain no magical benefits. Some exclusions may apply.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 03:26 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 08:13 pm (UTC)From:... So of course I post this and someone has posted something really intelligent that ends with a comment about not wanting people to so casually use "fuck" or "stupid."
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 09:25 pm (UTC)From:Weak and ineffectual; unsatisfactory: a lame attempt to apologize; lame excuses for not arriving on time.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-01 09:30 pm (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 12:04 am (UTC)From:It's like my beef with this (http://www.npr.org/2011/01/29/133311028/Extra-Extra) Wait Wait game. You might say it's a small thing, but it doesn't mean I felt any less insulted.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 12:45 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 06:01 am (UTC)From:I can say "That was a lame argument," and apply it literally and without reference to any minority group or as a euphemism for an actual derogatory word.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 12:26 pm (UTC)From:None at all.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 01:58 pm (UTC)From:Honestly, I admit I've had difficulty including "lame" in this category too, just because unlike the more obvious ones - gay, fag, cunt, not to mention the racial ones which have been on the outs for decades now - I had never actually heard people using it to refer to disabled persons in a derogatory manner *or* heard disabled people trying to reclaim it in a positive manner. But my experience is not the world, and there are people in the comments here and in the links who have a lot more contact with the disabled community saying it *is* still honestly used those ways. So there we are then.
That said, I'm still looking for good alternatives, because the closer something is to matching the connotations I'd have used it for, the easier it is to remember to use it instead. "Pathetic" is close. "Sad" works in some cases. Still pondering.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:42 pm (UTC)From:It's a very fine line.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-03 10:35 pm (UTC)From: