LJ keeps doing sketchy things wrt security and data mining (and stealing people's revenue by hijacking their affiliate codes). Here's a nice post by afuna on the current issue, which links to this detailed (and in non-jargony language) post.
LJ has been pissing me off over time. I've toyed with the ideas of stopping crossposting, or turning off comments on the crossposted posts. But the bulk of my peeps are on LJ, and none of you seem terribly inclined to move (other than the several of you who already have.)
I could give all my LJ friends OpenID access to my DW account (those of you who have DW accounts but don't use them would be exempt), but that would make it easier to connect the two IDs than it already is, and I prefer to keep them separate.
Question: If I stopped crossposting, or if I turned off comments on LJ, who would have a problem with coming to DW to comment? You don't have to create an account to read, or even comment: they support OpenID.
I don't want to keep supporting LJ and all their sketchy bullshit and keep providing content for them (even if it's mostly behind a flock) to get more ad revenue.
Dreamwidth has an amazing diversity statement, actively works to be accessible to the disabled, and stood up to repeated censorship trolls who targeted their payment providers (first paypal, then google checkout) under the spectre of "porn sites." They don't allow illegal materials (child porn, for example), but neither do they prohibit free expression. They will not allow advertisers.
I still have an invite code, if anybody wants one. I don't think there are free accounts right now, but you can buy a single-month paid account (for $3, iirc, though they've just introduced a points system which I don't fully understand) and let it lapse to become free. Yeah, it's kinda cheating, but their business model includes that situation. And if you decide you like it, you can buy more paid time.
They don't have a bunch of stupid "features" that nobody wants, and they took the spaghetti code from LJ and cleaned it up, so it works *better*.
It's kinda quiet over here, but the water's nice. Come on in.
LJ has been pissing me off over time. I've toyed with the ideas of stopping crossposting, or turning off comments on the crossposted posts. But the bulk of my peeps are on LJ, and none of you seem terribly inclined to move (other than the several of you who already have.)
I could give all my LJ friends OpenID access to my DW account (those of you who have DW accounts but don't use them would be exempt), but that would make it easier to connect the two IDs than it already is, and I prefer to keep them separate.
Question: If I stopped crossposting, or if I turned off comments on LJ, who would have a problem with coming to DW to comment? You don't have to create an account to read, or even comment: they support OpenID.
I don't want to keep supporting LJ and all their sketchy bullshit and keep providing content for them (even if it's mostly behind a flock) to get more ad revenue.
Dreamwidth has an amazing diversity statement, actively works to be accessible to the disabled, and stood up to repeated censorship trolls who targeted their payment providers (first paypal, then google checkout) under the spectre of "porn sites." They don't allow illegal materials (child porn, for example), but neither do they prohibit free expression. They will not allow advertisers.
I still have an invite code, if anybody wants one. I don't think there are free accounts right now, but you can buy a single-month paid account (for $3, iirc, though they've just introduced a points system which I don't fully understand) and let it lapse to become free. Yeah, it's kinda cheating, but their business model includes that situation. And if you decide you like it, you can buy more paid time.
They don't have a bunch of stupid "features" that nobody wants, and they took the spaghetti code from LJ and cleaned it up, so it works *better*.
It's kinda quiet over here, but the water's nice. Come on in.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:09 pm (UTC)From:Let me know if you need more codes, I have a few left.
(I'll reply to your FB message later today! Been busy, and laaazy about communications.)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:18 pm (UTC)From:Have you been able to move into your new flat? I saw you got keys, and that's exciting!
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:24 pm (UTC)From:I'm in the middle of moving! Went to IKEA yesterday and spent lots of money on furniture, which is supposed to be delivered on Monday. So that's when I'll move in permanently, I think. Should be getting Internet next Wednesday. I can't wait, honestly. It's all pretty exciting. :D
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:34 pm (UTC)From:Furniture is exciting! What district are you in?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:51 pm (UTC)From:Third district! Been wanting to move somewhere around there for ages, so I'm well chuffed. Where are you staying when you're in Vienna, again?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 04:08 pm (UTC)From:Oh, nice! We're staying in the 8th district at Pension Wild. (They're openly queer-friendly :D )
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 04:30 pm (UTC)From:And I know what you mean, but I think you still have ... fannish sensibilities, in a way? There's a fannishness many people retain even when they wander out of fandom, which I think keeps on connecting us all. (I never know how to describe it adequately, but people either have it or they don't. In RL, too. It's related to, but slightly different from, geekiness, and I tend to get along much better with people who have it.)
Ooh, right, I remember now! Well, one of the many nice things about Vienna is that it's small enough to get anywhere reasonably fast, especially as long as you stay within the inner districts. :D
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 05:05 pm (UTC)From:I think I know what you're getting at. It's a sort of community feeling, with an understanding of what it means to squee, and that makes a difference.
Vienna looks fabulous :) I'm so excited that we're staying within easy walking distance of the first district (and pretty close to a U-bahn stop).
no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 02:25 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 06:50 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 06:52 pm (UTC)From:I haven't totally committed to switching to DW, but it's looking really tempting.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 06:58 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 06:53 pm (UTC)From:Via the network, hoping that's okay
Date: 2010-04-28 03:56 pm (UTC)From:If you buy any paid time (the minimum is still a month for $3), you don't need the invite code to create an account -- and it's not cheating because they did totally plan for that *g*.
Re: Via the network, hoping that's okay
Date: 2010-04-28 04:11 pm (UTC)From:I always forget about codesharing! Probably because I don't know anyone who's clamoring for invitations :P
no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 09:09 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 01:57 pm (UTC)From:If you stopped crossposting, is there any way to see protected entries via LJ or would I need to use DW?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:08 pm (UTC)From:At some point in the future, there will be a way for (paid) users to read their LJ flists on DW. Mark is very concerned about privacy issues, of course, and they're working on both the code and the privacy end. If that ever comes about and integrates well, I won't have much reason to come to LJ at all.
(Also, LJ has been really sketchy on trans issues recently. That whole thing where they changed the gender dropdown and required a selection, and the QOTD the other day about "what would you do if you dated someone and found out they'd had a sex change?" that turned shortly thereafter into "what would you do if you dated someone and found out they'd committed a crime?" without any sort of demarcation in the QOTD feed...)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:38 pm (UTC)From:The only thing that keeps me here is the network effect. If I just wanted to post publicly about my life, there's all sorts of options for that and anybody using LJ could just subscribe to an RSS feed. Because I vastly prefer to post everything protected, I feel a little bit tied to LJ because that's where most folks are.
Though, if I could read my LJ flist from DW, I'd likely switch to DW and just crosspost comment-locked entries to LJ.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:56 pm (UTC)From:Does the option for you to crosspost locked entries, with comments off, and grant your LJ friends OpenID access appeal to you? It seems rather like a pain in the arse, but it could work. (And maybe your friends would get used to the other site and move there?)
Because, really, the main problem with a mass exodus is that it's hard to mobilize the mass to move. There's a lot of inertia.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:38 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:53 pm (UTC)From:One of my favorite things about DW is how they took LJ's sprawling mass of code that was just added to and added to and never cleaned up and made it efficient.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:03 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:16 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:41 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:49 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:59 pm (UTC)From:Crossposting is so easy from DW to LJ.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 02:38 pm (UTC)From:Until such time as flocked LJ posts become readable from DW, at which time I'm totally jumping the fucking ship.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:03 pm (UTC)From:Going to a different site can be annoying, which is why I'm asking. I don't even know when I'll make the decision.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:05 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:15 pm (UTC)From:I have a permanent account :P Though I've probably gotten my money's worth from it already...
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:20 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:32 pm (UTC)From:Also, I just read that comment thread on your journal, and within the next month? *squee*
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:39 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 03:48 pm (UTC)From:As for your questions, I'd be fine with commenting on your posts at DW, though I'd hope the experience would be pretty painless. (Would I need to type a password every time? That's not a deal breaker, but it might unconsciously make me hesitate a little.) (It might even be better that way: I assume that comments here aren't visible there and vice versa.) As for reading, if you stopped crossposting then I assume I'd shift to reading your blog via RSS. That would mean that I'd miss any friends-locked entries, which would be a shame.
Wow, that was a longer comment than you were asking for. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 04:00 pm (UTC)From:(My superficial understanding of OpenID is this: you want to log in to a website using OpenID from your LJ. You go to this website and put in your lj address (steuard.livejournal.com), then the website will go to LJ and say "does this user exist? is this computer really this user?". Then LJ will ask you "do you want to give this website a cookie to remember this OpenID?" and you say yes and go on your merry way.)
http://www.dreamwidth.org/openid/ probably explains it better than I could.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 04:43 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 06:37 pm (UTC)From:If you turned off comments, I'd comment as much as I currently do, assuming the OpenID stuff works like it should.
(my online todo site nominally supports openId, but only supports 1.1, and LJ has stopped supporting that old of a version. Which makes me annoyed. Anyways, I doubt DW and LJ would fall that far out of sync.)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 08:48 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-28 10:15 pm (UTC)From:I'm not happy with either, which is just making me less motivated to use either.
I wish there were a site I was happy with.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 12:16 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-29 12:19 am (UTC)From:Thus I don't trust LJ and I don't trust DW. I'd like to be on a site I feel I can trust.