feuervogel: (reading)
So, there are these up and coming fantasy authors who receive wide critical acclaim in the SFF community because of their amazing style and/or voice.

I can't stand them. It reads to me as overwritten and pretentious, which is everything I hate in fiction. For example, Catherynne Valente. I wanted to like Palimpsest, and I liked the idea behind it (a sexually-transmitted city? cool!), but when I read it, I kept wishing she hadn't spent so much effort on style.

I've read excerpts from a forthcoming novel (or very recently released?), and ... I have the same problem. I have no plans to read it entirely, so I won't mention the title here, though the author's initials are NJ. I've read gushing reviews, and, while the story might be good (fantasy has recently become very much Not My Cup of Tea), the writing hits me in that trying too hard spot.

(Then there's the dang (also horribly overwritten) Kushiel series, which I wanted to like but hated for a variety of reasons, including a) I wanted the narrator to die because she was such a self-absorbed twat and b) Carey made BDSM BORING. Also c) indentured sexual servitude of minors without their consent, aside from being born into it. WHICH ISN'T CONSENT, GUYS.)

So I must be defective, and a bad writer who likes bad writing, because I don't like these great New Fantasy™ writers and think they overwrite and are trying to become Literary. I like straightforward, unpretentious writing. And there's so much recently written that seems to be filled with Literary Allusions that Smart People should Get, though in reality Smart People means "former English majors."

I'll never be successful, I guess, if the market is all about attempting to write in a Literary style.

Date: 2010-02-17 03:33 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] luckykitty.livejournal.com
I laugh only because I have the opposite problem; I am sick of people liking dreck where people could not give a shit about the language, eg. horrible shit like the DaVinci Code and those goddamn Alex Cross novels or (jeezus fuck) Romance novels, so writers who actually give a damn about word choice Make Me Happy**.

It seems that genres definitely have their own popular voices and styles, and it does make it harder if you don't write in that particular style. But hard is not impossible. If you have a good story to tell and tell it well and keep trying, you'll find your audience.

** despite me not being an english major
Edited Date: 2010-02-17 03:34 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-02-17 04:11 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] luckykitty.livejournal.com
Well, I think that is a trouble with genre styles, because when you're working a lot in the genre you don't always notice that to an outsider, your voice may be overwrought or whatever. So if you're generally not inclined to like fantasy, then why worry about not agreeing that a fantasist is the greatest writer ever? Especially if you're not writing it yourself. It's as silly as me bitching about hating the way romance is written because I really can't stand that genre. I mean, obviously I still do it, but my point is, why beat yourself up over not liking the style if you do not like or work in the genre?

I think with fantasy you're more likely to get big fancy words/sentences because people want to evoke elegance and a certain atmosphere, days gone by. I know in my own work, I try to bring echoes of older fiction and fairytales into my fantasy work--it's a deliberate, informed voice choice. Ha, that rhymed!

Date: 2010-02-17 04:50 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] tsubaki-ny.livejournal.com
Cool Kids in the Cool Kids SFF Club

This whole concept needs to be retired. The only reason you're even thinking it is because we all spend too much damn time on the Internet getting into these people's head with their diaries and blogs and journals and BNFery, and whatever, when in actuality the real shopping, the real numbers, the real bulk of the sales, are still coming in from the people sitting, in-person, with their actual bodies, on the floor of B&N and Borders, who are not on the Internet in fucking "fandom" and have no clue what Cat Valente or anybody else thinks about anything at all, they just like what they like.

Nobody really genuinely important ever said you had to be "literary."

Now buck up immediately! ~__^

And stop reading book reviews of things you don't like in order to find fellow haters to help you feel sane. *has totally not been doing that for the past week HAVE NOT HAVE NOT HAVE NOT! I deny it!* ~__^ ~__^

Date: 2010-02-17 06:44 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] tsubaki-ny.livejournal.com
You are going to absolutely despise everything I write. ~_________^ Just so you know. Which is okay!

Date: 2010-02-17 06:58 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] botia.livejournal.com
because the reviewer makes up a bit about passing the butter that takes 5 overwrought paragraphs and involves heavy-handed foreshadowing.

I could not find this...cut and paste? I HAVE to see this :)

Date: 2010-02-17 07:57 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] steuard.livejournal.com
I can only assume that "use the right word, not its [second] cousin" was a reference to Mark Twain's fabulous essay on Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses (http://www.pbs.org/marktwain/learnmore/writings_fenimore.html) (intentionally or not), and I thank you for bringing it to mind. :)

Profile

feuervogel: photo of the statue of Victory and her chariot on the Brandenburg Gate (Default)
feuervogel

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
192021 22232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated 8 Jun 2025 11:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios