feuervogel: (writing)
feuervogel ([personal profile] feuervogel) wrote2009-09-14 10:26 am
Entry tags:

Wangst and weemo

I read a lot of writers' blogs. Or LJs, whatever. And I've started to feel like I'm inadequate and inept as a writer, because I wasn't an English major. I'm not Trained in things like Narrative Technique, Structure, and Symbolism, and I'm not well-read enough in classics, folklore, or myths to make use of Allusions.

I'm an impostor.

All I've got is some characters, a story idea, and 20-odd years of reading spec fic (and some Real Books™). No technique, no ideas for creative symbolism or structure or literary allusions.

I'm never gonna sell anything.

[identity profile] luckykitty.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Feeling you 100% :( That pretty much describes me to a T.

But honestly, I do wonder how many of these things really apply to all writers. It seems like they come from all walks of life and levels of education.

[identity profile] intravenusann.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's ridiculous. I am an English major--hell, I'm an English major 'with a concentration in Creative Non-Fiction' and I'm trained in all that stuff and well-read in classics, folklore, and myths (not just the Western, Greco-Roman, Biblical stuff either), but honestly I feel like you have a much better chance of becoming an author than I.

I think about it and how many authors do I love who were actually English majors? None. Zip. Zero. How innovative are my fellow English majors? How innovative am I in a sea of other writers and English majors who wish they could be writers? Leads me to feel that people who write become authors and English majors become teachers and professors and perpetuate the cycle.

Rather than piddling away time learning How To Be Like Everyone Else In Your Department And the Mainstream of Respectable Fiction and Non-Fiction That No One Ever Reads, you learned actually useful things and lived a life and read stories which were enjoyable--which I think gives you Something to Write About. Everything else is practice, persistence, and luck.

Also, this:



I hope it cheers you, since that was the intention. I'm probably bitter myself and I hope that doesn't overpower an effort to cheer.

[identity profile] chris-smith-atr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Bollocks. I'm not trained. And in all seriousness if you can get yourself one hell of a editor who understands your brain (poor thing in my case) and can recc you books about that sort of stuff -- you don't need to be. Yes it is harder work, yes you'll prob make the same stupid mistakes that I do. But the MOST important thing about writing is that you have a story to tell. The rest can be taught. That spark that makes something interesting can't. In my opinion of course.

[identity profile] pharna.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel you with 2D artwork. Sure I've had some formal training and all, but proportions are still a little iffy, lighting? REALLY iffy. Composition? Passable. Speed? I'm a goddamn snail, I take 4 hours to make what some genius kid shats out in what, 20 minutes?

I found this site and just nearly died.
http://iradukai.com/making/550/fuzitop.html

This site has a bunch of how tos that make me feel like an incompetent tard.

[identity profile] tsubaki-ny.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't need a degree or help from so-called experts to read. A lot of what an English degree does is simply to put names to a lot of things you already knew by osmosis.

[identity profile] smarriveurr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Shakespeare didn't major in English. Neither did Hemingway.

Neither, for that matter, did Asimov, Heinlein, L. Sprague de Camp or J.K. Rowling.

Some things you don't need school to learn. Some things that teachers insist on are wrong anyway. Good writing isn't all about following the Rules.

What you're doing is reading the work of people who're actually working in the field, many of whom also got the classical education. That actually puts you one up on those who just had the education, and certainly one up on losers like those folks up top, who didn't do either. ;)
Edited 2009-09-14 16:09 (UTC)

[identity profile] smarriveurr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 05:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I think there's something to be said for knowing the craft. But you can learn any craft without formal training, and sometimes formal training can actually get in the way. Likewise, the more trained you are, the more likely you are to take that training to heart, and particularly since genre writing is always considered "beneath" literary writers, if that's what you want to do, you're unlikely to get a lot of help from an English department.

College doesn't exist to somehow magically let you learn things you can't learn elsewhere - it exists to provide what is necessary to teach what you can't seem to grasp on your own, and to give you a piece of paper that says you're competent at what you know. That piece of paper doesn't matter when you're shopping manuscripts around, only the knowledge does.

Then again, you're talking to a guy who cut a straight month of math classes at JC, so grain of salt. I still got an A when I came back for test days, though, so make it a small grain.

[identity profile] chris-smith-atr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh I am very much an INTJ or ENTJ (depending on when I take the test) so don't worry :)

Interesting for me is when the story is pulling you forward. For instance I don't really LIKE the character I'm writing from First Person POV at the moment but he fascinates me by being very much himself. The story started out simple but things kept on piling up and sub-plots developed of their own accord. Everything is tying together perfectly -- like it would not in real life -- and all leading to the denoument.

That is what I call an interesting story. It also helps that the feedback I receive is positive. I have two very trusted friends whom I've known since fandom-days who're more than willing to tell me "this is shite."

So, write what makes you want to write and have good people who'll call a spade a spade in summary. :)

[identity profile] smarriveurr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, see, I went to most of my humanities classes, because the discussion usually mattered. Plus, Klaus was awesome and jumped me to third-year German based on my entrance testing. It was cute, he had to hand-write the option on the bottom of the form so he could check it off.

But, at any rate, you have the experience to understand - the classes are there for when you need someone to explain things, not for all your learning. ;)

[identity profile] chris-smith-atr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're very "I want to know where I'm going" have you ever tried to outline. It does not work for me fully (in that I tend to completely re-write my outline after every chapter) but it gives me a sense of knowing where the end is....

Feel free to post in meta_writer if you want tips from people who are a lot saner than me :)

[identity profile] smarriveurr.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Freshman English turned into College Writing Seminar (Proper name: Shit they damn well should have taught you in Highschool), which was bundled with Information Access (Subtitled: Mouse Use and Word Processing 101), and Extended Orientation (AKA: Don't get drunk and have promiscuous unprotected sex while high, mkay?). 5 credits, divided into 3 courses, and you were allowed 1 absence total in each, or you failed the whole goddamn five credits. And even though I had a 4 on the English AP, and a 5 on the CompSci AP, and the common sense God gave a dog, I couldn't get out of CWS, IA, or EO respectively.

My Extended Orientation session was 8:00 on a Monday. And, again, miss it more than once? Fail the things I should have tested out of on top of the thing that was no use to me. Yeah, not fun. At least the class eventually started meeting over breakfast in Baker.

Aside from that... well, in the MA/CS Department I was apparently known as "the best student you never see." It was a weird moment during the parent visitation thing in my first semester, because the head of the department knew me, told my parents about how well I was doing, and I hadn't had a class with her yet.

To this day, that's how I describe the JC to people - "A college so small, there were professors who knew my name, and I didn't know theirs."

[identity profile] tammylee.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh, and here it never even occurred to me to consider myself inadequate or inept as a writer because I am not an English major. It boils down to your ability to tell a story.

The thing to bear in mind is, you're not writing literary fiction, bb, you're writing genre fiction.

Nobody is going to deconstruct your work and inspect it for literary devices until your work becomes very popular and is considered groundbreaking or classic for genre fiction. AND EVEN THEN I find people will pick up far more meaning from your work than you consciously put in. =p

Page 1 of 3