feuervogel: (yeah right)
feuervogel ([personal profile] feuervogel) wrote2011-10-21 11:59 am
Entry tags:

"Passive"

Can I just say that I'm right tired of people saying that any instance of "to be" as a linking verb (eg, the pen was green) is passive? Because, seriously, it isn't.

It may be uninteresting writing; it may be lazy writing; it may be writing that isn't descriptive. But it sure as sugar isn't passive. That term has a specific meaning in English grammar, and that meaning does not include "every usage of forms of "to be" ever."

Mistakes were made. [This sentence is in passive voice, because the actor, ie, who made the mistake, is not specified.]
He made a mistake. [This sentence is in the active voice, because the actor is specified.]
Going hiking in the mountains without a warm jacket was a mistake. [This is absolutely not a sentence in the passive voice. "Was" here links the two nouns/noun phrases [going hiking etc] and [a mistake] and equates them. It is a linking verb. It is not passive voice.]

Please count all the instances of "to be" as a linking verb in this post. There are fifteen, by my count, not including the example sentence. If you think they need to be rewritten to be "not passive," please make suggestions on how to do that without making it overwritten garbage.
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)

[personal profile] legionseagle 2011-10-21 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
This sounds like one of my rants from my writing critique group.

Have you had the "verbs incorporating any part of the verb 'to be" are passive" idiocy yet? Such as "The cat was eating the salmon which had been in the fridge" being marked as containing two passive verbs?
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)

[personal profile] legionseagle 2011-10-21 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
You look at a poem like Auden's Musee de Beaux Arts and realise that people who have that "simple past is the only option" have no idea why that poem works and what it's about - the layered effect of foreground and background done in words by tenses.