Heads up: more bad behavior from LJ

[feuervogel]

They are adding your location to all comments with IP logging on. Retroactively. (release notes) This is much more accurate than plugging it into a reverse IP site, reportedly.

If you (on LJ) log IP and are not among the subset of people I want knowing my address, I won't be commenting any more. I'll also be checking to see if I have that turned on (only for anonymous, I think) and turn it off if I do.

Slowly, LJ gives me more reason to consider shutting down.

ETA: They're rolling back the changes in response to the comments on the release post. Thank fuck.

Comments

[picklish]

I read the comments on that post. My point is that if online harassers have your IP, then they already have all the information that they need.

Besides, they don't even need to own the journal in question to get that information. They could just put an image in a comment that they know you will read and check their own server logs for your IP. You're using the internet; your IP is logged everywhere.

I agree that it's superfluous information, but that's not a reason to think this is something horrific. There's no change in privacy policy here. There's no new information being shared or recorded. There's only easily available derived information from what was already accessible and logged.

[feuervogel]

You win, fine. I'm overreacting, irrational, and computer illiterate.

[picklish]

...excuse me?

I thought I was having a reasonable discussion with you in which I happened to disagree with your position.

I have no problem with you wanting to stop having the discussion about LJ, but I'd like to understand what I said that caused such a comment from you.

Do you think that I was insinuating any of those things in what I said? Was my tone such that I deserve that sort of response? I felt like I was being fairly dispassionate in expressing my disagreement.

[feuervogel]

I felt like "I have a hard time feeling bothered by this" was saying that I am overreacting because I am bothered by this. I felt like the explanation of how IP locators work, which I already am aware of, was talking down to me.

[picklish]

How could I have better expressed my disagreement in that I do not find SUP's behavior in this instance particularly bad in a way that wouldn't have made you feel like I was accusing you of overreacting?

There was no intention on my part to talk down to you and I will endeavor to not come off as such in the future. I was simply trying to defend the position that I was trying to argue and would have made the same statements in talking to anybody.

If it helps to turn this around, I certainly don't feel like you were talking down to me in your comment about how IP logging can be used by mods to stop trolls. It seemed to me that you were saying that as part of the point you were trying to make and not explaining it to me as if it was something I hadn't ever thought of before.

[feuervogel]

I don't know. "I don't think this is particularly evil" or something. My brain makes associations for reasons I don't understand.

[picklish]

I'll admit that I'm having a hard time following how that differs from what I said. I'm trying to be sincere and not rude here, but if even you don't know what I should have done differently, how am I supposed to avoid saying something in the future that might cause you to make comments like that one above?

I can very much empathize with your brain making associations and patterns of thought that you'd rather it not. Maybe next time you could give me the benefit of the doubt that I'm not talking down to you or criticizing you personally? I hope that you have known me long enough and well enough to give me at least that much latitude.

(And, if you want to stop a conversation with me in the future, I would much more appreciate a simple "Let's just agree to disagree." or even no response at all.)