You've also said you'd think about it, because you'd never heard it before. Which means you're open to the idea that, hey, these people are telling me this hurts them, maybe I should reconsider. And that's a positive step.
(I don't think anyone is arguing here against using lame in reference to horses, because that's the traditional meaning: inhibited because of injury. There might be someone arguing such, as there are arguments against the use of "lame duck session" of congress.)
no subject
(I don't think anyone is arguing here against using lame in reference to horses, because that's the traditional meaning: inhibited because of injury. There might be someone arguing such, as there are arguments against the use of "lame duck session" of congress.)