But social justice, while it attempts to equalize outcomes, often violates the principle of equality under the law. Just because it tramples upon it in a way that you approve doesn't make it right.

You're saying that because biases and privileges exist it means that a wealthy executive should be legally obligated to pay for a poor janitor's cancer treatments? That makes no sense.

(Man, I forgot how much that fb exchange pissed me off. And how condescending it was at the end. Damn.)

edited: to make it not a strict C&P from facebook